Digital forensic expertise

Shedding technical light on a case without lowering the standard of proof.

This page sets out the digital forensic practice: the frameworks under which engagements take place, the working method, the deliverables to expect and the points requiring particular care when working on data, devices and systems.

A court-appointed digital forensic expert, Yann Sanchez belongs to several French associations of court-appointed experts: the Compagnie des experts de justice en criminalistique (CEJC, the forensic science experts' association; admitted as an active member on 1st September 2026), the Compagnie des Experts de Justice de Lyon (the Lyon association of court-appointed experts) and the Compagnie Nationale des Experts de Justice en Informatique et Techniques Associées (CNEJITA, the French national association of court-appointed IT experts; admitted on 2 September 2026). He is also a member of AFSIN, the French-speaking association of digital investigation specialists.

Professional affiliations

Membership of these professional associations is personal and separate from the company YSAX; it constitutes neither a certification nor an accreditation.

Availability

Court-appointed digital forensic expert in Lyon, working on site or remotely.

Listed with the Lyon Court of Appeal

Yann Sanchez is listed with the Lyon Court of Appeal (Cour d'appel de Lyon) as an expert in the digital field. In France, courts appoint their experts from the registers held by each court of appeal, and being entered on such a register follows a formal application and vetting procedure. He can therefore consider requests for court-appointed digital forensic work in Lyon and the surrounding areas whenever the terms of the engagement allow.

Beyond the local area

The listing is attached to one court of appeal, but it does not confine the work to that area: a court anywhere in France may appoint an expert listed elsewhere. Cases located in other parts of the country can therefore be scoped on a quotation basis, with remote preparation or travel to site where physical presence genuinely adds value to the case.

Common situations

Real cases where a technical reading changes how the file is understood.

Unfair competition

An employee leaving, the suspected extraction of customer files, document transfers, disputed use of a business application or unusual access to data.

Data theft or leak

Confidential documents, customer databases, strategic files, exports, access logs or traces that help establish what actually circulated.

Online evidence

A web page, a post, an account, a mailbox, a profile, a collaborative workspace or any content that may be altered, deleted or disputed.

Accounts and mailboxes

Sign-ins, forwarding rules, settings, conversations, attachments, administration traces or anything useful in building a timeline.

Business applications

History, exports, an accessible database, application logs or internal data needed to explain a commercial or operational dispute.

Multi-device cases

Computers, phones, removable media, backups or logs to be cross-referenced in order to establish a consistent timeline.

Method

A clear sequence, from the first conversation to the final report.

01

First conversation

Identify the context, the legal framework, the urgency, the people concerned and what the analysis is meant to help establish or rule out.

02

Technical scoping

Map out the devices and media, accounts, access rights, data volumes, practical constraints and known limitations before any collection or on-site work.

03

Operations

Collect, preserve or analyse the relevant material, documenting the actions taken, the technical choices made, any incidents and the limitations encountered.

04

Reporting

Produce usable findings, structured for technical and non-technical readers alike, with care in distinguishing what is established, what is probable and what is uncertain.

What you receive

Material you can actually use, not just a technical analysis.

Workable scoping

A clear view of the scope, the objectives, the devices and media and the constraints before committing to heavier work.

Preserved material

Copies, exports, captures, logs or technical items collected in line with the terms of the engagement and documented so that they remain readable.

Timeline

Dates, access events, files, events, accounts and actions brought together to help understand what most likely happened.

A clear report

Structured reporting that distinguishes findings, hypotheses, limitations and the points where further material is needed.

Article 145 CPC

Preparing a useful operation without going beyond the scope set by the court.

Before the operation

  • A technical reading of the need and of the objectives pursued
  • Identification of the systems, devices and media likely to be covered
  • Anticipation of practical constraints: access, data volumes, encryption, accounts
  • Preparation of the means of extraction, imaging or targeted search

During and after

  • Strict compliance with the scope of the court order
  • Adaptation to the technical environment actually encountered
  • Documentation of the operations performed, of incidents and of limitations
  • Structuring of the material so that it can be exploited later

Skills applied

Digital specialisms placed at the service of judicial reasoning.

Internet, social networks and electronic communications Systems, software and hardware engineering IT project engineering Telecommunications and networks Digital data

Devices & equipment

Computers, phones, removable media, backups, GPS units, cameras and application environments.

See the devices analysed

Traces & timelines

Logs, metadata, files, system artefacts, conversations, events and time correlations.

Reporting

Structured reports, technical appendices, summaries a non-specialist can follow, and explicit statements of the limitations of the analysis.

Frequently asked questions

Terms of engagement, method and reporting.

Do you work as a court-appointed digital forensic expert in Lyon?

Yes. Being listed with the Lyon Court of Appeal and based in Lyon makes local engagements straightforward, while still allowing requests from anywhere in France to be considered, depending on the framework, the deadlines and whether travelling is genuinely worthwhile.

Under what frameworks do you take on digital forensic work?

Requests may arise from a court appointment, a private (non-court-appointed) engagement, technical assistance to a judicial officer, an Article 145 measure or a pre-litigation matter that calls for digital analysis.

How is an operation prepared?

A first conversation clarifies the legal framework, the devices and media concerned, the deadlines, the people who will be present, the access available and the constraints on collection or analysis.

Is an on-site visit always necessary?

Not always. Depending on the case, part of the scoping, the analysis or the reporting can be done remotely; travelling to site is preferred when it adds concrete value to the collection or to the understanding of the facts.

What is the difference between an IT expert and a court-appointed digital forensic expert?

Any IT specialist can provide a technical analysis. A court-appointed digital forensic expert is something more specific under French law: the title corresponds to an official listing on the register of experts held by a court of appeal (cour d'appel), granted after a formal application and vetting procedure and reviewed periodically. French courts appoint their experts from those lists, and the expert then works under a court order as an independent officer assisting the court, not as a party's adviser. In practice this means heightened attention to evidence, to the traceability of every operation performed, to the adversarial principle (both sides heard) and to reporting that the court, the parties and their lawyers can actually use.

Anonymised references

Examples of cases, presented without any confidential detail.

Unfair competition

Article 145 measure

Technical assistance during an operation aimed at identifying specific customer files, in a sensitive context requiring procedural rigour and adaptation to the environment encountered.

Complex criminal case

Multi-device investigation

Extensive analysis in a long-running case, covering location data, photographs, encrypted messages, text messages and other relevant digital material, across a large number of devices.

30+
cases handled
50/50
civil / criminal
300+
devices examined
150+
devices in a single major case

Work with the justice system

Engagements with courts, investigation units and judicial officers' firms.

Criminal justice

Engagements and collaborations in judicial and investigative settings, with a constant requirement for technical rigour, traceability and adaptation to the context.

Courts

  • Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon (Judicial Court)
  • Tribunal judiciaire de Bourg-en-Bresse

Investigation services

  • Brigade de recherches de Trévoux (gendarmerie investigation unit)
  • Brigade de recherches de Mions
  • Section de recherches de Lyon (regional gendarmerie investigation unit)

Civil justice

Technical support in civil litigation, in particular for digital investigation operations and the search for usable technical evidence.

Judicial officers' firms (études de commissaires de justice)

  • Jurikalis
  • Juris 38
  • Evolhuis

Tools

A toolkit chosen to fit the case, not the other way round.

Write blocker dc3dd sha256sum mmls fsstat fls istat mactime tsk_recover PhotoRec ExifTool identify / ffprobe XRY / XAMN UFED Magnet Acquire Autopsy ADB iLEAPP / ALEAPP MVT Volatility PiRogue Tool Suite Bash / PowerShell